Inaccurate AI generated argument loses taxpayer £2.5k case

Judge finds appellant’s argument formed using an AI tool was inaccurate and not relevant which ‘highlights the dangers of reliance on AI tools without human checks’ resulting in the appeal being dismissed

Bodrul Zzaman represented himself at the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) to appeal against a discovery assessment for £2,501 for high income child benefit charge (HICBC) for the 2018-19 tax year. This was issued by HMRC under section 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970.

Zzaman’s initial argument was that HMRC v Jason Wilkes [2021] applied to his circumstances. Additionally, since he was a PAYE employee with ‘fluctuating income’ he found it difficult to keep track of his earnings.

The appellant also stated that because he was a PAYE taxpayer then HMJRC should have been aware of his tax liabilities, and the HICBC was unfair in his opinion, while it also breached his and his wife’s human rights.

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe