What does the FRC’s overhauled investigation process mean for firms?

FRC revisions to the Audit Enforcement Procedure (AEP) change the way audit firms are supervised and directly affect company directors. Mark Beardsworth, partner and associates Sharon Takhar and Nikara Rangesh at Signature Litigation explain the implications

Reforms to The Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) Audit Enforcement Procedure (AEP) became effective at the beginning of July. Via three new pathways, they raise the threshold for commencing enforcement, forming part of a philosophical shift by the regulator towards early engagement and faster resolution.

When concerns arise through a whistleblower report, awareness of potential misconduct, or a new internal investigation, the reforms mean that it is more likely that auditors engage earlier with the FRC.

Important considerations arise for firms about whether, when and how to self-report issues to regulators. In practice, two key risks emerge:

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe