Audit materiality, judgments and adjusted errors

Katherine Bagshaw FCA examines the Financial Reporting Council's (FRC) latest audit quality thematic review of materiality and talks to key stakeholders about their views on judgment issues from adjusted errors to performance materiality and profit adjustments, and the UK regulatory requirement to assess materiality

Firms rarely greet the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) regulatory reports with much enthusiasm. When all is said and done, it is the FRC’s job to find fault and chivvy auditors along. Firms sometimes find it hard to hide their exasperation with what seems to them to be a one-sided view, not to mention their irritation at the somewhat patrician tone.

But the FRC’s December 2017 Audit Quality Thematic Review Materiality, which updates the 2013 review, seems to be something of an exception. Jack Kelly, audit partner at Deloitte says: ‘On the whole, this review is fair and balanced, and it is good to see the FRC recognising that firms have responded to the 2013 review – it is really very positive.’

The F

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe