The new IHT debt rules have a
scattergun approach which hit some targets but miss others, says Julia
Rosenbloom
Inheritance tax (IHT) has arguably had more than its fair share
of anti-avoidance attention over the last decade. This is perhaps
surprising given that its contribution to the Treasury is well below
that of the other major taxes. One could speculate that there is some
sort of morbid link between this and the rising cost of care for the
elderly and pensions (like a form of post-death clawback of benefits)
but I suspect the reasons are far simpler – the government
needs money and it will make every effort to maximise tax intake,
in whatever form.
Already subscribed? Please log in.
Your free features:
- Breaking news and expert analysis
- Customisable daily newsletters
- Six free CPD learning modules each year
- Personalised CPD tracker
- Top 75 Firms league tables
- Regulatory changes
- Hardman’s Tax Data