Judicial review rejected in £1.8m loan charge repayment case

The High Court has dismissed to grant a judicial review of a decision by HMRC to refuse to give a taxpayer assurance that he would not be taxed if he ‘rescinded’ repayments of loans to an Employee Benefit Trust (EBT)

The High Court held that, although in principle such a decision would not constitute a forward tax agreement of the type held to be outside HRMC’s powers in the Al Fayed case, on these particular facts HMRC was right not to give the taxpayer that assurance.

The application for the Judicial Review of HMRC was made by Iain Clamp who had been the beneficiary of an employee benefit trust (EBT) arranged by his employer. Between June 2005 and August 2010 loans from this trust amounting to £1,885,000 had been made to him.

These loans had not been taxed as earnings because they were made before the introduction by the Finance Act 2011 of the ‘disguised remuneration’ provisions of Part 7a, ITEPA 2003, under which they would otherwise have been a taxable ‘relevant step’.

In 20

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe