Woolf: public audit office only independent answer

In the wake of Deloitte’s £15m fine over its work at Autonomy, Emile Woolf puts forward the case for a new public audit office to resolve the auditor independence argument once and for all

The ‘flawless’ audit exists in the mind alone. Regulators such as the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) are, therefore, having to deal with the many that, in varying degrees, are flawed.

However, the FRC’s practice of allowing so many years to pass before reporting their findings and punishing the culprits undoubtedly weakens its authority and blunts its effectiveness.

Since companies’ financial statements are published annually the time taken to audit those statements must, by definition, be less than a year. Yet consider the FRC’s latest finding - on Deloitte’s audit of the software company Autonomy Corporation. Can it seriously be claimed that justice has been served – despite the imposition of a £15m fine on the firm (plus costs of over £5m) and a total of £750,000 on two responsible partners – when the disgraceful audit work to which the finding relates took place more than a decade earlier?

Why was th

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe