Care worker tax and benefit rules not fit for purpose

Image

Care workers are losing out because of the confusing and unhelpful way in which their working arrangements and low pay interact with tax, welfare and minimum wage rules, according to a study by the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)

The research is based on queries received from people working in the sector. LITRG found many care workers are unable to benefit from tax relief on their unreimbursed travel expenses because they earn too little or find the reclaim process too difficult, and cannot qualify for working tax credit because the number of hours they work – that they are directly paid for – are too low.

The problem arises because care workers do not have to be paid the minimum wage for the time they spend travelling between assignments or from home to visit their clients, even though the amount they are paid for client contact time is supposed to make up for the time they spend travelling between assignments and the expenses they incur in doing so, LITRG says.

Anne Fairpo, LITRG chair, said: ‘Issues such as non-payment of travel time and being given zero hours contracts (which facilitate the non-payment of travel time) then have confusing knock on effects for a care worker’s tax and benefits position, and can put low-paid care workers at a disadvantage in unexpected ways.

‘While the tax system theoretically gives care workers tax relief on their travel costs – even home to work travel that is not allowed by the minimum wage rules - this is probably no more than 20p for every pound spent or mile claimed.

‘If they are non-taxpayers, as many of them are, they will get no tax relief – which is often a nasty shock. Where care workers are due something back, they may well find the administration process for claiming the relief they are due very difficult.’

LITRG says that the interaction between non-payment of travel time and tax credits is equally disturbing. To be entitled to working tax credit (WTC), a carer needs to work a minimum number of hours in remunerative work – broadly 16 or 24 a week if they have a child, 30 a week if not.

Where the employer does not pay care workers directly for their travel time this will not count towards their weekly remunerative hours, which may leave them insufficient to meet the minimum WTC requirement.

Fairpo said: ‘These factors, combined with irregular earnings under zero-hours contracts, result in care workers not only struggling to make ends meet day to day, but not knowing from one week to the next what their entitlement to WTC will be.

‘Moving in and out of entitlement should not happen under universal credit which is replacing tax credits, but it is a much less generous and more burdensome regime in which zero-hours contracts do not sit easily.’

LITRG is calling for the government to consider options for providing relief to non-taxpayers for their travel expenses (e.g. by allowing carry forward or carry back of claims in certain circumstances, or by allowing claims to National Insurance relief).

It also wants changes to  minimum wage rules so that care providers must pay travel time as a separate item, or change tax credit rules to accept unpaid travel time as remunerative hours of work so that workers receive the support they need.

In addition, LITRG says the government should do more to ensure that tax credit and universal credit claimants are aware of their right to deduct unreimbursed expenses from their income, and the limitations of Real Time Information data in this respect.

Government should proceed cautiously with plans to impose strict conditionality rules for care workers on zero-hours contracts who claim universal credit, and should consider how care workers who are not currently earning above the lower earnings limit might be able to cheaply access the National Insurance contributions and benefit system.

Fairpo said: ‘This report paints a depressing picture for care workers but is an important contribution to the debate about remuneration and conditions in the care working sector.

‘Government and local authorities need to do more to ensure that care workers are supported in the vital work that they do – a small step towards this goal would be to make some of our recommended changes to the background systems they rely on and we stand by willing and ready to help in any way we can.’

LITRG report, Care workers – challenges of the tax and benefits system

Report by Pat Sweet

 

Pat Sweet | Reporter, Accountancy Daily [2010-2021]

Pat Sweet was the former online reporter at Accountancy Daily and contributor to the monthly Accountancy magazine, pub...

View profile and articles

0
Be the first to vote

Rate this article

Related Articles
Subscribe