Court of Appeal rejects IHT avoidance scheme

The Court of Appeal has dismissed the reversal of an 'entirely artificial' IHT avoidance scheme on the grounds of a mistake 

The appellants, the Bhaur family, entered into an inheritance tax (IHT) agreement in late 2006 with James O’Toole, who operated a tax advisory business named Aston Court.

Marketed as an ‘asset liberation solution’, the scheme saw the assets of the Bhaurs property business placed into a separate company called Safe Investments UK.

In February 2007, the Bhaurs incorporated their business and transferred the beneficial interests to Safe Investments UK. The family were then placed as relevant shareholders, directors and employees.

Safe Investments UK then hived the business down to its newly created wholly-owned BVI subsidiary, referred to as Gooch Investment.

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe