Fraud trials, juries and the case for clarity

Forensic accountant, Liesel Annible, an expert witness in dozens of fraud trials, examines the unintended consequences and implicit danger of ending the use of juries in financial fraud trials

Recent proposals by justice secretary David Lammy to curb the use of juries in a wide swathe of criminal trials have brought the future of jury-led justice sharply into focus. Although the proposed changes would affect a range of criminal cases, the implications for fraud trials raise serious concerns.

The suggestion that complex financial crimes might be tried by judge-only courts revives long-standing concerns over fairness, transparency and the role of ordinary citizens in delivering justice, concerns especially acute when the evidence involves intricate financial systems and expert testimony.

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe