Landmark privilege rulings affect auditors and clients

What the Court of Appeal gives, the High Court takes away: two major decisions on legal professional privilege in the cases of ENRC v SFO and Financial Reporting Council v Sports Direct International plc have important ramifications for auditors and audit clients. Ross Dixon and Chris du Boulay at Hickman and Rose examine the decisions

Legal professional privilege has long been recognised as a ‘fundamental human right’, which exists to ensure that individuals (and companies) can confidentially access legal services. However, whether privilege applies is not always clear. Hotly contested disputes can end up before the courts with the decisions in these cases creating a changing legal landscape and considerable uncertainty as to the scope of this fundamental legal protection.

Two recent decisions, the Court of Appeal in Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation (ENRC) [2018] EWCA Civ.2006, and the High Court in the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) v Sports Direct International plc [2018] EWHC 2284 (Ch), further complicate the position for auditors and audit clients.

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe