Pensions Regulator names companies flouting auto enrolment

Image

The Pensions Regulator has released its first name and shame list of employers who have been taken to court for failing to pay fines for workplace pension non-compliance, including 13 companies which have been fined £220,000 to underline the importance of meeting automatic enrolment requirements

The worst offenders were 20 employers who were given escalating penalty notices (EPNs) for a total of more than £60,000. However, despite having paid the escalating penalty notices, these employers continue to be non-compliant with their workplace pension duties.

Another list includes 13 employers, who refused to pay escalating penalty notices of more than £220,000, and then faced court orders demanding payment. They include both compliant businesses, and non-compliant businesses whose cases are being reviewed pending further action.

Organisations across the UK, from the north of Scotland to the south of England, have been named and shamed, including a law firm in London and a hotel in Reading which was fined £14,000, while Woodlands Manor Care Home Ltd in Bristol owed £52,500 under auto enrolment rules.

Charles Counsell, The Pensions Regulator’s executive director of automatic enrolment, said: ‘Employers who wilfully refuse to become compliant should be in no doubt that we will take enforcement action against them, as these lists show.’

There was a large increase of inspections of business premises to check for compliance, up from 57 in whole of 2016 to 224 inspections over the three-month period.

More than 4,673 fixed penalty notices of £400 for automatic enrolment non-compliance were issued in the first three months of 2017, up from 2,919 the previous quarter – the largest total issued to date.

Auto enrolment was introduced in 2012 and is a compulsory pension compliance system for employers, whereby they have to provide auto enrolment pensions and contribute to them, while employees can opt out if they wish.  

A study by Chase de Vere, a firm of financial advisers claims that the administrative burden is the biggest hurdle for companies when implementing auto enrolment.

Nearly four in 10 (37%) of employers surveyed cited the admin overload as a big deterrent, whit 23% complained about the cost of providing auto enrolment pensions for their staff.

Just 5% of those polled used an accountant to advise on setting up auto enrolment, while 62% opted to manage pension administration in house, compared to 11% who used payroll services or an accountant.

Sean McSweeney, corporate advice manager, Chase de Vere, warned: ‘Costs will rise for many employers as minimum contribution levels are increased in April 2018 and again in April 2019.’

Pat Sweet

Pat Sweet | Reporter, Accountancy Daily [2010-2021]

Pat Sweet was the former online reporter at Accountancy Daily and contributor to the monthly Accountancy magazine, pub...

View profile and articles

0
Be the first to vote

Rate this article

Related Articles
Subscribe