Warning to accountancy firms not to use confusing names

After audit firms mixed up in high profile case, ICAEW revises guidance for audit-registered firms to ensure names of businesses do not lead to mistaken identity

ICAEW has been forced to update guidance after two firms with similar names mixed up.

The updated guidance is targeted at firms looking to become audit registered or registered firms wanting to change their name in a bid to reduce the risk of confusion between firms.

ICAEW warned that confusion over names raises ‘the risk of potential reputational damage to the firm with no connection to the reported issue’.

Existing guidance makes it clear that a firm’s name should not be misleading, and the revised version underlines the importance of following the recommendations.

ICAEW cites examples of unacceptable practice as when a member firm with very few offices describes itself as international, or if a sole practitioner adds the suffix ‘and Associates’ to the name, or using a name which is very similar to another, creating a ‘real risk that it could be confused with the name of another unconnected firm’.

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe