FRC decision to drop HBOS KPMG inquiry leaves questions for audit regulator

The decision by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) to abandon its investigation of KPMG’s audit of HBOS has been heavily criticised but the audit profession has mounted a defence albeit raising questions about the future of the regulator. Calum Fuller reports

In the weeks following the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) decision that it would not be pursuing disciplinary action against KPMG over its audit of HBOS in the period that led up to the bank’s collapse in 2008, there has been no small amount of astonishment, particularly from commentators, MPs and the public that we are still no closer to holding anyone responsible for the crash in 2008.

Naturally, the profession has defended itself, stoically initially, particularly the FRC’s role and indeed its own. Many stakeholders, such as PwC chief risk officer Margaret Cole and tax partner at law firm Hickman & Rose, Ross Dixon (see HBOS-KPMG: looking beyond the audit) claim that the FRC did not have much of a chance of finding against KPMG.

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe