HMRC wins Hoey £79k disguised remuneration case

The court has ruled that a taxpayer was liable to pay £79,581 worth of tax on his income which was paid through a tax avoidance scheme

The Court of Appeal has dismissed the appeal from Stephen Hoey against discovery assessments totalling £79,581 from HMRC ruling that his income, which was paid to him through a disguised remuneration scheme, was liable for tax.

During the tax years from 6 April 2008 to 5 April 2011, Hoey was an IT specialist who participated in two tax avoidance schemes, Penfolds and Hamilton, where he received loans from offshore employee benefit trusts (EBTs).

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe