This article, the eleventh in our series on the Companies Act 2006, will focus on protection for minority shareholders through the use of derivative claims and the rule in the historic Foss v Harbottle case
A company is essentially a democracy in that decisions made in general meetings are by a majority of members. The underlying assumption is that the majority are committed to ‘promoting the success of the company’.
On occasions, inevitably, power tends to corrupt; and the majority – particularly if they are also directors – whether through incompetence or self-interest may not steer the company in the direction of its best interest. In this situation a minority of members may believe that action is necessary to bring the company back to the right path.
Requiring the directors to call a meeting is a useful first step to allow discussion, but if the majority will not change course, the minority will simply be outvoted.