Woolf: goodwill write-off periods must be limited

As the collapse of Carillion and Thomas Cook have shown, auditing goodwill and impairments can represent insurmountable problems for auditors, so maximum write-off periods for these intangibles could be the only solution, argues Emile Woolf

What do the accounting terms ‘contingent’ and ‘intangible’ have in common? Both words evoke uncertainty and hence flag the existence of an auditing hazard.

Incidentally, both words are derived from the Latin ‘tango’, meaning ‘touch’: when several possible outcomes are in touching distance, there is a risk that, for example, a ‘contingent’ liability may crystallise into an actual liability.

Similarly, an intangible asset is one that you cannot actually touch: examples are patents, copyrights, customer lists, intellectual property generally, and of course the ultimate intangible, goodwill, which is so ephemeral that its very existence may be open to doubt.

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe