Woolf: it’s not about the money

The Financial reporting Council (FRC) needs to explore the potential impact of non-financial sanctions, such as reputational damage, for firms at fault for audit failures, argues Emile Woolf

The main objectives of the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) sanctions policy are to improve audit performance, protect the public from sub-standard work, maintain market confidence and uphold proper auditing standards. The policy emphasises that its purpose is not to punish, but to protect the public through deterrence.

This is illogical: if a firm’s failure to uphold standards leads to a finding of misconduct, and a multimillion pound fine is imposed by an enforcement tribunal of the FRC, can the firm really say ‘we have not been punished, but have helped to protect the public’?

Muc

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe