Graham Elliott, partner at Haysmacintyre
The Macaw Properties case in the first tier tribunal clarifies
the issue of VAT reclaims on recurring expenditure
The Macaw Properties Limited V HMRC [2012]
UKFTT 167 case illustrates the well-known point that it is
one’s intention when incurring expenditure as to how it is
to be used (in VAT terms) which determines whether or not and to what
extent the taxpayer can reclaim the VAT.
Already subscribed? Please log in.
Your free features:
- Breaking news and expert analysis
- Customisable daily newsletters
- Six free CPD learning modules each year
- Personalised CPD tracker
- Top 75 Firms league tables
- Regulatory changes
- Hardman’s Tax Data