The primacy of ‘Intention’ plays out in Macaw case

Graham Elliott, partner at Haysmacintyre

The Macaw Properties case in the first tier tribunal clarifies the issue of VAT reclaims on recurring expenditure

The Macaw Properties Limited V HMRC [2012] UKFTT 167 case illustrates the well-known point that it is one’s intention when incurring expenditure as to how it is to be used (in VAT terms) which determines whether or not and to what extent the taxpayer can reclaim the VAT.

Your free features:

  • Breaking news and expert analysis
  • Customisable daily newsletters
  • Six free CPD learning modules each year
  • Personalised CPD tracker
  • Top 75 Firms league tables
  • Regulatory changes
  • Hardman’s Tax Data

Sign up to Business & Accountancy Daily

Related Articles
Subscribe